Fixing PD's "respect" problem
Stephanie Hirsh
Twice a year, NSDC Distinguished Senior Fellow Hayes Mizell and I visit
with our national advisors to explore issues relevant to the field
of professional learning and NSDC's work. Recently we met with one of
our advisors, Kent McGuire, dean of the College of Education at Temple
University and a former assistant secretary of education during the
Clinton administration. I want to share one of the topics from our
recently completed session with Dr. McGuire. I invite you to join the
conversation by responding to the questions with your own thoughts.
Collectively, we will get smarter about how to market and improve
professional development.?
One issue we explored we labeled
the "Rodney Dangerfield challenge." Why is it that professional
development does not get the respect it deserves? McGuire suggests that
some hold the view that educators should learn all they need to know to
be successful in their preparation programs. He suggests we combat this
argument by turning our attention to other respected professions. Would
we take our children to doctors who failed to keep up with the
research in their fields? Would we contract with architects who were
not knowledgeable on the latest technology and green methods?
McGuire
also suggested we provide vivid examples of the kinds of research,
information, and tools that teachers must continue to learn that are
not part of traditional preparation programs. I know this problem is
not characteristic of all school systems, and I want us to do more to
showcase the systems and school leaders who understand why PD is vital
and the actions they take to advance it. When these districts share
their successes, I hope they report how their investment in
professional development contributed to these results.?In fact, I hope
they boast about their plans for ensuring their teachers are up to date
on all aspects of the science of learning. These are the systems and
schools all teachers and students deserve. Why do we continue to settle
for less?
McGuire also suggested we need to tell better
stories about the impact of professional development. He noted that
within every community there is at least one school that at one time
may have struggled with performance issues and today celebrates the
success of its students. In most cases, these schools have a
professional development story to tell. And these stories are critical
to developing the case for building respect for professional
development.?If you have one of these stories, I invite you to identify
the school, the city, and the state and summarize the PD and its
impact. I hope we collect hundreds of these stories and we use them
over and over to spread our message. Together lets make sure PD gets
the respect it deserves.
Stephanie Hirsh is NSDC's executive director.?
Posted in Stephanie Hirsh |
Jan 28, 2010 at 9:55 AM
I am not going to lie, this blog made me feel ashamed of how I view our districts in-service days. As a teacher I can attest to the dull workshops that the district sets up for the staff to attend. They often assign individuals to come in and speak with the staff about irrelevant material that does not pertain to student success or educational proficiency. However, I do believe that educators should participate in professional development opportunities. As you have stated, I would not take my child to a doctor who did not continue to update their practices so why would I want my child being taught by an ignorant teacher. With that being said, all educators should be active in professional development in order to pursue a title of an expert teacher within their content matter. This will allow students to receive the most current and up to date educational strategies.
Rob Ranck